Tamara and Marcus: A Family Medicine Resident Household, Scored
Tamara is a third year family medicine resident with $280,000 of federal student loans and a plan she chose on purpose in her intern year. Her household scores 51 out of 100 on the Financial Vital Signs, in the Corrections band, and every missing point has a name. This is the full breakdown from their Financial Health Assessment episode: what the household looks like, where the 51 points came from, and the five moves worth 24 more.
Key takeaways
- The loan strategy was decided in PGY-1, not drifted into: income driven repayment with $0 payments on $280,000 of federal loans, aimed at the forgiveness decision she will make as an attending.
- One system earns sixteen of their points: saving about 12 percent of household income into Roth IRAs for both spouses, automated, with spending tracked and less than 3 percent unaccounted for.
- The protection layer is the hole. Group disability through the residency program is all they carry: no individual own occupation policy, no life insurance, no umbrella, no estate documents.
- Their goals are written but vague, two or three of them, with dollars flowing and nothing fully funded. The Decision Filter cannot aim money at goals that have no amounts or dates.
- Five fixes are worth 24 points, from a 51 to a 75: written goals with amounts and dates, stretch saving toward 25 percent, a three month emergency fund, an individual disability policy this year, and a $1 million term life policy.
The household
Tamara is 29, a PGY-3 family medicine resident earning about $65,000. Her husband Marcus is 30 and works in IT support, earning about $75,000. They have been married three years, have no kids yet, and live in a large metro area in the Southeast. Household income is about $140,000.
| Item | Where it stands |
|---|---|
| Student debt | $280,000 federal, on an income driven plan with $0 payments, chosen deliberately in PGY-1 |
| Other debt | None. Credit cards are paid in full every month |
| Emergency fund | About one month of expenses, roughly $5,000 |
| Saving | About 12 percent of income, into Roth IRAs for both spouses, automated |
| Taxes | 22 percent federal bracket, known to them, with the Roth IRAs as the deliberate move |
| Health insurance | Employer plan, both covered |
| Disability | Residency program group long term disability only. No individual own occupation policy |
| Life insurance | None |
| Umbrella | None |
| Malpractice | Covered through the residency program, occurrence policy |
| Estate documents | None |
| Total assets | Roughly $30,000 |
| Goals | Two or three written down, including paying off the loans and buying a house after residency, funded in part |
Residents get their own version of the Financial Vital Signs scale. Nobody on a resident salary is graded on debt to income, because that anchor does not enter the score until the attending years. What the resident scale grades is the starting line: the loan strategy, the savings system, the protection layers, and whether the goals exist in writing.
The score: 51 out of 100
The 51 points arrive in five groups, and the groups tell the story better than the total does. The decisions this household made deliberately score almost perfectly. The layers they have not gotten to yet score almost nothing.
| Group | Points | What earned them |
|---|---|---|
| The debt decisions | 10 | Full credit for the loan strategy and for cards paid in full with no other debt |
| The savings system | 16 | The savings floor, full automation, a tracked spending leak under 3 percent, and stretch saving credit at 12 percent |
| Protection | 8 | Health coverage in full, malpractice through the program, and partial credit for the group disability policy |
| The buckets | 10 | Milestones met for a resident household, most dollars sorted into named lanes, money flowing toward goals |
| Taxes and goals | 7 | Roth chosen deliberately for both spouses, the bracket known, goals written down |
What they did well deserves saying plainly. The loan strategy got decided in PGY-1, on purpose, instead of drifting into default payments. The credit cards are paid in full. The Roth IRAs run for both spouses on a resident household income, and the automation means nobody has to remember. Spending is tracked monthly and the leak is under 3 percent. Health coverage and malpractice are handled through their employers and program. That is a stronger foundation than most attending households show.
Deep dive one: goals that cannot aim
The Decision Filter is the framework that decides what a household says yes and no to, and it runs on stated goals with amounts and dates. Tamara and Marcus have the raw material and not the aim: two or three goals, written down, with money flowing toward them and none of them fully funded or priced. Pay off the loans is a direction, not a goal. A goal is a number and a date: this balance, retired by this year, through this program.
The fix costs nothing but an evening. Write four or more goals with dollar amounts and dates, fund them in order, and run every large purchase through the filter before it happens. On its own, that work is worth points in the goals boxes and the funding boxes at once, because aimed money counts twice in this household's score: once for existing, and once for being aimed.
Deep dive two: time is the whole advantage
The Physician Wealth Equation scores the forces that build wealth, and the force this household owns outright is time. Family medicine is the lowest paid specialty on this site, and Tamara is 29 with more than thirty years of compounding in front of her. The late start penalty that crushes longer training pathways barely exists here. Every year of stretch saving now is worth years of it later, which is why the prescription pushes the savings rate toward 25 percent while the household is young, healthy, and still living on a resident shaped budget.
The window cuts both ways. The same youth and health that make compounding powerful make disability coverage cheap, and this is the year to buy it. An individual own occupation policy in PGY-3 is priced on a healthy 29 year old. The group policy through the program is a start, and this household's score shows exactly what a start is worth: partial credit, and a hole everywhere else in the protection stack.
The prescription
Five moves, in order, each one named with the framework it belongs to:
1. Write four or more goals with dollar amounts and dates (Decision Filter). Aim the dollars that are already flowing.
2. Push stretch saving toward 25 percent (Physician Wealth Equation). The resident window never comes back, and this household already proved it can run the system at 12 percent.
3. Build the emergency fund to three months (3 Bucket Framework). One month is a wish. Three months is a Safety Net that lets the rest of the plan survive a bad season.
4. Buy individual own occupation disability coverage now, in PGY-3 (Protection Stack). It will never be cheaper than it is this year.
5. Buy a $1 million, 30 year term life policy (Protection Stack). This household runs on two incomes, and right now neither one is insured. Lock the rate while it is priced on two healthy people in their early thirties.
The math closes cleanly. Those five moves add 24 points across the goals, savings, reserve, disability, and life boxes: 51 becomes 75, and the household leaves the Corrections band with nothing but residency sized steps. No windfall, no inheritance, no attending paycheck required. That is what a good starting line is worth.
What this case teaches family medicine
Family medicine residents do not lose points on income. The scale knows what residency pays. They lose points the way this household did: protection layers postponed because the program provides something, goals left vague because the attending decisions feel far away, and a reserve that stays at one month because nothing has gone wrong yet. The wins are equally repeatable: decide the loan strategy in the first year, automate Roth saving for both spouses before the attending money arrives, and buy coverage while it is priced on your training age. The stage page for residents works through the same moves in order: family medicine resident and fellow finances. The loan fork Tamara will face at graduation is worked in full on the student loans page, and the coverage gaps in her score are the subject of the insurance page.
About
Ryan Inman is a retired financial planner who worked with about 500 physician families. He created the Financial Residency podcast (about 3 million downloads) and is no longer affiliated with it. Financial Fellowship is his sole focus. This guide is educational. Last updated October 2026.
Have a money question we have not answered?
If you have a question about a decision you are about to make, ask it here.
Ask your questionMore reading
Should a family medicine attending pay off $882K in private student loans or invest?
With a plan built on the one fact that changes everything: private loans have no forgiveness coming, so this debt
How do I set a savings rate that still builds wealth on a family medicine salary?
You do not set it. You build the system that produces it, and then you read it off the result.
How much more does rural family medicine pay, and is the premium worth it?
The premium is real, and on average it is about $55,000 a year. Stroudwater Associates, in the State of
If you have a question about a decision you are about to make, ask it here
Ask your question